AI Trainer Pay Terms
The median published figure in the AI Trainer Pay Terms is 6 GBP across 1 source's own page in GBP (range 6 to 6 GBP; 2 sources publish a figure), read 7 November 2026.
Of 4 named sources read in full, 2 publish a figure and 2 do not, read 7 November 2026.
The median is unchanged since 31 October 2026 (was 6 GBP across 1).
By term
| Breakdown | Median | Range | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| termpublished-minimum | 6GBP | 6 to 6GBP | 1 |
| termpay-basis | 90USD | 90 to 90USD | 1 |
Each source and its figures
Each row is one published figure: what the source's own page states, a link to that page and the date we read it. Nothing appears here that a source did not publish.
| Source | Figure | Breakdown | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindrift: freelance AI developer work (how projects pay) | 90USD | pay-basis | 2026-11-06 |
| Prolific: underpaying studies | 6GBP | published-minimum | 2026-11-07 |
Read the original wording (2)
- Mindrift: freelance AI developer work (how projects pay), read 2026-11-06:
Rates on Mindrift reach $90/hr, you get to use your existing development skills, you don't need ML experience, and the platform handles project sourcing.
- Prolific: underpaying studies, read 2026-11-07:
Researchers must pay at least £6/$8 per hour—this is our absolute minimum reward rate.
Sources with no stated figure
2 named sources publish nothing usable on the pages we read. Each is recorded as not publishing, and no number is supplied in its place.
- Prolific: how much should you pay participants, read 2026-11-07: every candidate on the page was refused
- Mercor: AI trainer salary (how pay works), read 2026-10-23: every candidate on the page was refused
How the figures are worked out
Every number traces to a quoted sentence on the publisher's page, captured on the date shown along with a hash of the page text.
2 of 4 readable sources publish a figure; 2 were read in full and publish nothing, so they are counted as silent; 1 could not be reached.
The summary statistics use one value per source in GBP.
43 candidate sentence(s) were rejected in review, each for a recorded reason.
What this dataset is chartered to add later, beyond the published figures shown: per platform: pay basis, published minimum, payout rail and cadence, entry test, referral bonus; across: share paying per task vs per hour, share with a published minimum
We set aside 43 candidate sentences found on these pages, each with a written reason from the reviewer.
5 sources, with links
- Prolific: underpaying studies(reproduced for comment; publisher's terms)
- Prolific: how much should you pay participants(reproduced for comment; publisher's terms)
- Mercor: AI trainer salary (how pay works)(reproduced for comment; publisher's terms)
- Mindrift: freelance AI developer work (how projects pay)(reproduced for comment; publisher's terms)
- outlier.ai(reproduced for comment; publisher's terms)
Use this figure
The median published figure in the AI Trainer Pay Terms is 6 GBP across 1 source's own page in GBP (range 6 to 6 GBP; 2 sources publish a figure), read 7 November 2026.
Of 4 named sources read in full, 2 publish a figure and 2 do not, read 7 November 2026.
AI Trainer Pay Terms, term published-minimum: median 6 GBP across 1 source, read 7 November 2026.
AI Trainer Pay Terms, term pay-basis: median 90 USD across 1 source, read 7 November 2026.
The median is unchanged since 31 October 2026 (was 6 GBP across 1).
To cite: "aitrainerpay.com AI Trainer Pay Terms", updated 2026-11-07, https://aitrainerpay.com/datasets/ai-trainer-pay-terms/.
Get the CSV (2 rows, updated 2026-11-07)
Questions this data answers
How does each platform measure and pay the hour (per task or per hour, minimum, payout rail and day, unpaid qualification), and what does it ask to get in?
The median published figure in the AI Trainer Pay Terms is 6 GBP across 1 source's own page in GBP (range 6 to 6 GBP; 2 sources publish a figure), read 7 November 2026.
Where do the figures in the AI Trainer Pay Terms come from?
Every figure is quoted from its source's own page and dated (last read 7 Nov 2026). 4 named sources were read and 2 publish a figure; the 2 that publish none are recorded as not published, never estimated.